<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: More Granny Smith Fireworks</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/</link> <description>Website of photography loving, mac-using, Christian molecular biology graduate working in web design.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-67354</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=3697#comment-67354</guid> <description>No doubt... I&#039;ve got a couple of entry pieces of glass, both zoom lenses (18-105 &amp; 70-300)... neither of them are fast. My lowest aperture is on the 18-105. I get f 3.5, but only at 18 mm.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt&#8230; I&#8217;ve got a couple of entry pieces of glass, both zoom lenses (18-105 &amp; 70-300)&#8230; neither of them are fast. My lowest aperture is on the 18-105. I get f 3.5, but only at 18 mm.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-63453</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:21:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=3697#comment-63453</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-63199&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt; --- Heh, I&#039;m sure lotsa folks would love to set off fireworks. I think it&#039;s illegal to do so privately here, or maybe just illegal to buy them except in the ACT. I love taking photos of them when I can though. I should go through my New Years ones...Heh, I know what you mean about expensive hobbies, although re:photography, if you can manage to be content with your gear and push your own skills rather than needing new gear it might become cost effective in terms of $$ per hours of entertainment. I&#039;ve gone through long periods of lusting after new cameras and even though I&#039;d still like one, especially with better low-light capabilities, I&#039;m still using my first dSLR. Not sure if that holds with lens investments or not. So far all my lenses have been less than $400, haven&#039;t branched out to the $1000+ ones yet. Wouldn&#039;t mind a fast wide-angle zoom though, they look sweet.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-63199" rel="nofollow">James</a> &#8212; Heh, I&#8217;m sure lotsa folks would love to set off fireworks. I think it&#8217;s illegal to do so privately here, or maybe just illegal to buy them except in the ACT. I love taking photos of them when I can though. I should go through my New Years ones&#8230;</p><p>Heh, I know what you mean about expensive hobbies, although re:photography, if you can manage to be content with your gear and push your own skills rather than needing new gear it might become cost effective in terms of $$ per hours of entertainment. I&#8217;ve gone through long periods of lusting after new cameras and even though I&#8217;d still like one, especially with better low-light capabilities, I&#8217;m still using my first dSLR. Not sure if that holds with lens investments or not. So far all my lenses have been less than $400, haven&#8217;t branched out to the $1000+ ones yet. Wouldn&#8217;t mind a fast wide-angle zoom though, they look sweet.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-63199</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:20:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=3697#comment-63199</guid> <description>These shots make me want to go light of some fireworks... if you knew me, you&#039;d know that I don&#039;t need much of an excuse, either. Between fireworks and shooting photos, my hobbies are too expensive! :-&#124;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These shots make me want to go light of some fireworks&#8230; if you knew me, you&#8217;d know that I don&#8217;t need much of an excuse, either. Between fireworks and shooting photos, my hobbies are too expensive! :-|</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-53053</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:58:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=3697#comment-53053</guid> <description>Glad you like it Lauren. Me too!I read somewhere that 2--4s was a good shutter speed for fireworks so I started in that range and then decided to see what happened if I closed the aperture a bit more and decreased shutter speed a bit, and I liked it. So, I had these settings for a bit and then I think I opened back to 4s at the end when there were more going up at once (and when I realised I&#039;d left the ISO at 400 from some shots earlier in the evening I put that back down to 200 for the end of the display as well).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like it Lauren. Me too!</p><p>I read somewhere that 2&#8211;4s was a good shutter speed for fireworks so I started in that range and then decided to see what happened if I closed the aperture a bit more and decreased shutter speed a bit, and I liked it. So, I had these settings for a bit and then I think I opened back to 4s at the end when there were more going up at once (and when I realised I&#8217;d left the ISO at 400 from some shots earlier in the evening I put that back down to 200 for the end of the display as well).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LaurenMarie - Creative Curio</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2009/10/more-granny-smith-fireworks/#comment-53019</link> <dc:creator>LaurenMarie - Creative Curio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=3697#comment-53019</guid> <description>They look like flowers! How cool! I do like the framing on this one. How did you figure out a good shutter speed? The last one was 3s and this is 6s. Just trial and error or had you planned which settings to try?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look like flowers! How cool! I do like the framing on this one. How did you figure out a good shutter speed? The last one was 3s and this is 6s. Just trial and error or had you planned which settings to try?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 291/296 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.kristarella.com @ 2012-02-11 15:55:44 -->
