<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Weird CSS background loading issue</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/</link> <description>Website of photography loving, mac-using, Christian molecular biology graduate working in web design.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jaced</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-26384</link> <dc:creator>jaced</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-26384</guid> <description>For permanent record, the suggestion by MarkupService above does indeed point to the fix.For elements that have full-width backgrounds and are getting clipped as described in the early part of this discussion, we added the following to them and the problem is solved:width:100%; min-width:90em;Special thanks to Kristarella for being so gracious with her mind and time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For permanent record, the suggestion by MarkupService above does indeed point to the fix.</p><p>For elements that have full-width backgrounds and are getting clipped as described in the early part of this discussion, we added the following to them and the problem is solved:</p><p>width:100%; min-width:90em;</p><p>Special thanks to Kristarella for being so gracious with her mind and time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Markup Service</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22436</link> <dc:creator>Markup Service</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22436</guid> <description>Hello ,You try doing the following to fix the problem:Please add the folowing code in style.css#footer{overflow:hidden;}
#footer,#header,#nav{min-width:60em;}this code will fix this bug in FF2/3.In case you need further help, please do not hesitate to contact us.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ,</p><p>You try doing the following to fix the problem:</p><p>Please add the folowing code in style.css</p><p>#footer{overflow:hidden;}<br
/> #footer,#header,#nav{min-width:60em;}</p><p>this code will fix this bug in FF2/3.</p><p>In case you need further help, please do not hesitate to contact us.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22429</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:09:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22429</guid> <description>Aha - I think I&#039;ve found a fix (at least for standards compliant browsers), and I&#039;ve tested it on this site (good old Firebug) - use the CSS attribute for the footer div of &quot;min-width: AApx&quot; where AA is the entire pixel width of the &#039;About Me&#039;, &#039;Twitter&#039;, &#039;Recent Haiku&#039;, and &#039;Latest Photos&#039; div boxes. So I&#039;ve used &quot;min-width: 1000px;&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha &#8211; I think I&#8217;ve found a fix (at least for standards compliant browsers), and I&#8217;ve tested it on this site (good old Firebug) &#8211; use the CSS attribute for the footer div of &#8220;min-width: AApx&#8221; where AA is the entire pixel width of the &#8216;About Me&#8217;, &#8216;Twitter&#8217;, &#8216;Recent Haiku&#8217;, and &#8216;Latest Photos&#8217; div boxes. So I&#8217;ve used &#8220;min-width: 1000px;&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tracey Grady</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22376</link> <dc:creator>Tracey Grady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:37:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22376</guid> <description>You were right to put this into a blog post - you&#039;ve got some great answers. I didn&#039;t know that 100% width would fix the problem, even though I do use it in my CSS at times.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were right to put this into a blog post &#8211; you&#8217;ve got some great answers. I didn&#8217;t know that 100% width would fix the problem, even though I do use it in my CSS at times.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22363</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:06:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22363</guid> <description>Thanks Gio and Pasquale! I&#039;d hoped that posting this thing might get some useful responses and I was right!I hope your answers might help others with the same problem if they find this post. I didn&#039;t find anything useful when I was searching the topic myself.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gio and Pasquale! I&#8217;d hoped that posting this thing might get some useful responses and I was right!</p><p>I hope your answers might help others with the same problem if they find this post. I didn&#8217;t find anything useful when I was searching the topic myself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22362</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:04:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22362</guid> <description>Thanks Yan! I&#039;ll definitely try to fix that 100% thing soon.Hmm, I hadn&#039;t thought about the smilies in that way. They worked well will previous designs... You may be right. I will think about whether they belong a bit more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Yan! I&#8217;ll definitely try to fix that 100% thing soon.</p><p>Hmm, I hadn&#8217;t thought about the smilies in that way. They worked well will previous designs&#8230; You may be right. I will think about whether they belong a bit more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yan Shall Blog</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22358</link> <dc:creator>Yan Shall Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:03:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22358</guid> <description>I used to have this kind overflowing issue and wrapping it in a  with a 100% width did the job well.Nice blog design you have it here. I just thought that the smiling icons are a bit out of place here. Anyway, just my 4 cents....Yan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have this kind overflowing issue and wrapping it in a  with a 100% width did the job well.</p><p>Nice blog design you have it here. I just thought that the smiling icons are a bit out of place here. Anyway, just my 4 cents&#8230;.</p><p>Yan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pasquale</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22350</link> <dc:creator>Pasquale</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22350</guid> <description>You just need to define a width to 100% on the portions that need scaling, so they expand to the correct width.like &lt;code&gt;
#footer{width:100%;}
&lt;/code&gt;If it&#039;s in a wrapper, pull it out, or make sure the wrapper can reach 100%</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just need to define a width to 100% on the portions that need scaling, so they expand to the correct width.</p><p>like <code><br
/> #footer{width:100%;}<br
/> </code></p><p>If it&#8217;s in a wrapper, pull it out, or make sure the wrapper can reach 100%</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gio</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22345</link> <dc:creator>Gio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:58:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22345</guid> <description>Hi Kris,My new layout had the same problem, actually. I found a way around it, which is to use 2 divs for that section. Let&#039;s take your footer. There&#039;s a #footerWrap with a width:100%, and the actual #footerContent with a specific width of, say width:960px and a margin:auto (this part is important to center the inner div). Then, depending on how your images are set up, you can set the background style for each or both divs. I hope that was clear enough. Actually, I think I&#039;ll dedicate a blog post about this bug/fix tomorrow :)PS: Feel free to look through my CSS if you want to see how I did it. Actually, the top navigation still has that bug, but the footer is fixed.PPS: In your footer, I would set the tiling background on the #footerWrap and leave the #footerContent background clear.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kris,</p><p>My new layout had the same problem, actually. I found a way around it, which is to use 2 divs for that section. Let&#8217;s take your footer. There&#8217;s a #footerWrap with a width:100%, and the actual #footerContent with a specific width of, say width:960px and a margin:auto (this part is important to center the inner div). Then, depending on how your images are set up, you can set the background style for each or both divs. I hope that was clear enough. Actually, I think I&#8217;ll dedicate a blog post about this bug/fix tomorrow :)</p><p>PS: Feel free to look through my CSS if you want to see how I did it. Actually, the top navigation still has that bug, but the footer is fixed.</p><p>PPS: In your footer, I would set the tiling background on the #footerWrap and leave the #footerContent background clear.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22343</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:24:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22343</guid> <description>Thanks for the links Chris!I think it might be a wrap or element thing too... it doesn&#039;t always happen when sites have one main body background.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Chris!</p><p>I think it might be a wrap or element thing too&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t always happen when sites have one main body background.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 346/351 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.kristarella.com @ 2012-02-11 16:31:47 -->
