<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weird CSS background loading issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/</link>
	<description>Website of photography loving, mac-using, Christian molecular biology graduate working in web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaced</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-26384</link>
		<dc:creator>jaced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-26384</guid>
		<description>For permanent record, the suggestion by MarkupService above does indeed point to the fix.

For elements that have full-width backgrounds and are getting clipped as described in the early part of this discussion, we added the following to them and the problem is solved:

width:100%; min-width:90em; 

Special thanks to Kristarella for being so gracious with her mind and time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For permanent record, the suggestion by MarkupService above does indeed point to the fix.</p>
<p>For elements that have full-width backgrounds and are getting clipped as described in the early part of this discussion, we added the following to them and the problem is solved:</p>
<p>width:100%; min-width:90em; </p>
<p>Special thanks to Kristarella for being so gracious with her mind and time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markup Service</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22436</link>
		<dc:creator>Markup Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22436</guid>
		<description>Hello ,

You try doing the following to fix the problem:

Please add the folowing code in style.css

#footer{overflow:hidden;}
#footer,#header,#nav{min-width:60em;}

this code will fix this bug in FF2/3.

In case you need further help, please do not hesitate to contact us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ,</p>
<p>You try doing the following to fix the problem:</p>
<p>Please add the folowing code in style.css</p>
<p>#footer{overflow:hidden;}<br />
#footer,#header,#nav{min-width:60em;}</p>
<p>this code will fix this bug in FF2/3.</p>
<p>In case you need further help, please do not hesitate to contact us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22429</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22429</guid>
		<description>Aha - I think I&#039;ve found a fix (at least for standards compliant browsers), and I&#039;ve tested it on this site (good old Firebug) - use the CSS attribute for the footer div of &quot;min-width: AApx&quot; where AA is the entire pixel width of the &#039;About Me&#039;, &#039;Twitter&#039;, &#039;Recent Haiku&#039;, and &#039;Latest Photos&#039; div boxes. So I&#039;ve used &quot;min-width: 1000px;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha &#8211; I think I&#8217;ve found a fix (at least for standards compliant browsers), and I&#8217;ve tested it on this site (good old Firebug) &#8211; use the CSS attribute for the footer div of &#8220;min-width: AApx&#8221; where AA is the entire pixel width of the &#8216;About Me&#8217;, &#8216;Twitter&#8217;, &#8216;Recent Haiku&#8217;, and &#8216;Latest Photos&#8217; div boxes. So I&#8217;ve used &#8220;min-width: 1000px;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22376</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22376</guid>
		<description>You were right to put this into a blog post - you&#039;ve got some great answers. I didn&#039;t know that 100% width would fix the problem, even though I do use it in my CSS at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were right to put this into a blog post &#8211; you&#8217;ve got some great answers. I didn&#8217;t know that 100% width would fix the problem, even though I do use it in my CSS at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristarella</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22363</link>
		<dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22363</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gio and Pasquale! I&#039;d hoped that posting this thing might get some useful responses and I was right!

I hope your answers might help others with the same problem if they find this post. I didn&#039;t find anything useful when I was searching the topic myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gio and Pasquale! I&#8217;d hoped that posting this thing might get some useful responses and I was right!</p>
<p>I hope your answers might help others with the same problem if they find this post. I didn&#8217;t find anything useful when I was searching the topic myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristarella</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22362</link>
		<dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22362</guid>
		<description>Thanks Yan! I&#039;ll definitely try to fix that 100% thing soon.

Hmm, I hadn&#039;t thought about the smilies in that way. They worked well will previous designs... You may be right. I will think about whether they belong a bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Yan! I&#8217;ll definitely try to fix that 100% thing soon.</p>
<p>Hmm, I hadn&#8217;t thought about the smilies in that way. They worked well will previous designs&#8230; You may be right. I will think about whether they belong a bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yan Shall Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22358</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan Shall Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22358</guid>
		<description>I used to have this kind overflowing issue and wrapping it in a  with a 100% width did the job well.

Nice blog design you have it here. I just thought that the smiling icons are a bit out of place here. Anyway, just my 4 cents....

Yan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have this kind overflowing issue and wrapping it in a  with a 100% width did the job well.</p>
<p>Nice blog design you have it here. I just thought that the smiling icons are a bit out of place here. Anyway, just my 4 cents&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquale</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22350</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22350</guid>
		<description>You just need to define a width to 100% on the portions that need scaling, so they expand to the correct width.

like &lt;code&gt;
#footer{width:100%;}
&lt;/code&gt;

If it&#039;s in a wrapper, pull it out, or make sure the wrapper can reach 100%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just need to define a width to 100% on the portions that need scaling, so they expand to the correct width.</p>
<p>like <code><br />
#footer{width:100%;}<br />
</code></p>
<p>If it&#8217;s in a wrapper, pull it out, or make sure the wrapper can reach 100%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gio</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22345</link>
		<dc:creator>Gio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22345</guid>
		<description>Hi Kris,

My new layout had the same problem, actually. I found a way around it, which is to use 2 divs for that section. Let&#039;s take your footer. There&#039;s a #footerWrap with a width:100%, and the actual #footerContent with a specific width of, say width:960px and a margin:auto (this part is important to center the inner div). Then, depending on how your images are set up, you can set the background style for each or both divs. I hope that was clear enough. Actually, I think I&#039;ll dedicate a blog post about this bug/fix tomorrow :)

PS: Feel free to look through my CSS if you want to see how I did it. Actually, the top navigation still has that bug, but the footer is fixed.

PPS: In your footer, I would set the tiling background on the #footerWrap and leave the #footerContent background clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kris,</p>
<p>My new layout had the same problem, actually. I found a way around it, which is to use 2 divs for that section. Let&#8217;s take your footer. There&#8217;s a #footerWrap with a width:100%, and the actual #footerContent with a specific width of, say width:960px and a margin:auto (this part is important to center the inner div). Then, depending on how your images are set up, you can set the background style for each or both divs. I hope that was clear enough. Actually, I think I&#8217;ll dedicate a blog post about this bug/fix tomorrow :)</p>
<p>PS: Feel free to look through my CSS if you want to see how I did it. Actually, the top navigation still has that bug, but the footer is fixed.</p>
<p>PPS: In your footer, I would set the tiling background on the #footerWrap and leave the #footerContent background clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristarella</title>
		<link>http://www.kristarella.com/2008/08/weird-css-background-loading-issue/#comment-22343</link>
		<dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/?p=1299#comment-22343</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links Chris!

I think it might be a wrap or element thing too... it doesn&#039;t always happen when sites have one main body background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Chris!</p>
<p>I think it might be a wrap or element thing too&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t always happen when sites have one main body background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
