<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Transparency and GIFs</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kristarella.com/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/</link> <description>Website of photography loving, mac-using, Christian molecular biology graduate working in web design.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15079</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:16:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/blog/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15079</guid> <description>Yeh - they thought the move was going to take 4-8 hours, which I thought was fairly impressive. In the end it took closer to 24 hours with a few glitches after starting back up. Still, I respect the way they did things, it was a bold move to take everything down all at once and I think this past day of downage and glitches is better than a week or more of unreliability. Apparently the problems are all fixed now :PThanks for your comments! Suggestions never go astray :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh &#8211; they thought the move was going to take 4-8 hours, which I thought was fairly impressive. In the end it took closer to 24 hours with a few glitches after starting back up. Still, I respect the way they did things, it was a bold move to take everything down all at once and I think this past day of downage and glitches is better than a week or more of unreliability. Apparently the problems are all fixed now :P</p><p>Thanks for your comments! Suggestions never go astray :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marco Ruelicke.net</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15072</link> <dc:creator>Marco Ruelicke.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/blog/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15072</guid> <description>good to see your blog being up again. :up: I checked your site earlier but after the server move it was a bit broken :shrug:Depending on your skills you could enable/disable the script based on the browser used. Browsershots in general is a useful tool, but usually it can&#039;t check javascript related hacks, at least that&#039;s what I experienced...Anyway, I just felt like that I should mention the hack, you never know... ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to see your blog being up again. :up: I checked your site earlier but after the server move it was a bit broken :shrug:</p><p>Depending on your skills you could enable/disable the script based on the browser used. Browsershots in general is a useful tool, but usually it can&#8217;t check javascript related hacks, at least that&#8217;s what I experienced&#8230;</p><p>Anyway, I just felt like that I should mention the hack, you never know&#8230; ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kristarella</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15071</link> <dc:creator>kristarella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:38:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/blog/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15071</guid> <description>Yep! I used that hack on my previous template. I seem to remember it working and then not working. I was using linux and checking IE on Browsershots. So, perhaps Browsershots just wasn&#039;t giving the javascript time to load before taking the picture.
I think I prefer this method to using hacks. It seems more solid because sometimes you can&#039;t predict what someone else&#039;s browser is going to do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep! I used that hack on my previous template. I seem to remember it working and then not working. I was using linux and checking IE on Browsershots. So, perhaps Browsershots just wasn&#8217;t giving the javascript time to load before taking the picture.<br
/> I think I prefer this method to using hacks. It seems more solid because sometimes you can&#8217;t predict what someone else&#8217;s browser is going to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marco Ruelicke.net</title><link>http://www.kristarella.com/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15067</link> <dc:creator>Marco Ruelicke.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.kristarella.com/blog/2007/09/transparency-and-gifs/#comment-15067</guid> <description>interesting tutorial, but may I add that there is some kind of IE6 hack which allows you fix the png bug? I don&#039;t remember the hack right now, would have to research it again. If you want to know the hack, let me know and I will go through my older pages where I used it :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting tutorial, but may I add that there is some kind of IE6 hack which allows you fix the png bug? I don&#8217;t remember the hack right now, would have to research it again. If you want to know the hack, let me know and I will go through my older pages where I used it :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 280/285 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.kristarella.com @ 2012-02-11 05:46:35 -->
